WASHINGTON โ€” A group of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives is proposing to shift funds from NASAโ€™s climate change research coffers to the agencyโ€™s manned spaceflight program, an effort they say could preserve what they described as the agencyโ€™s core mission even as the new GOP-controlled House seeks to make good on vows to roll back federal discretionary spending this year.

โ€œWith your help, we can reorient NASAโ€™s mission back toward human spaceflight by reducing funding for climate change research and reallocating those funds to NASAโ€™s human spaceflight accounts, all while moving overall discretionary spending toward [fiscal 2008] levels,โ€ states a Feb. 7 letter to Rep. Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, and Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), chairman of the panelโ€™s commerce, justice, science subcommittee that oversees NASA spending.

The letter was signed by Reps. Pete Olson (R-Texas), Bill Posey (R-Fla.), Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Sandy Adams (R-Fla.), Rob Bishop (R-Utah) and Mo Brooks (R-Ala.). All hail from states with a major stake in U.S. human spaceflight.

In the letter, the lawmakers took issue with recent increases in climate change research spending, which has topped President Barack Obamaโ€™s environmental policy agenda since he took office in January 2009. Congress approved Obamaโ€™s $1.4 billion request for Earth science for 2010, even increasing the number slightly to $1.42 billion. And though Congress has yet to approve a federal spending bill for 2011, leaving NASA and other agencies to operate at 2010 spending levels, House and Senate authorizers endorsed Obamaโ€™s $1.8 billion request for Earth science programs during the current year in the NASA Authorization Act of 2010, which was signed into law in October.

The authorization measure also endorses spending $3.8 billion on manned space exploration programs this year. With Republican leaders in the House pushing to curtail federal discretionary spending, the letter urges Rogers and Wolf to ensure that NASA stays focused on that activity.


RELATED ARTICLES
Continuing Resolution Would Boost NASAโ€™s Budget $186M

Draft Spending Bill Increases NASAโ€™s Budget by $186M over 2010


โ€œFor years, Presidents and Congress have charged NASA with completing tasks that fall outside the scope of NASAโ€™s primary mission,โ€ the letter states. โ€œSpecifically, NASA spent over 7.5 percent โ€” over a billion dollars โ€” of its budget on studying global warming/climate change in Fiscal Year 2010.โ€

The letter also says climate change research garnered the lionโ€™s share of NASAโ€™s $1 billion in 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds, though NASAโ€™s plan for spending the economic stimulus money included just $325 million for major climate change research priorities set in the U.S. National Research Councilโ€™s most recent decadal survey.

The letter states that excessive spending on climate monitoring initiatives is not limited to NASA.

โ€œOverall, the government spent over $8.7 billion across 16 Agencies and Departments throughout the federal government on these efforts in [fiscal 2010] alone,โ€ the letter states. โ€œGlobal warming funding presents an opportunity to reduce spending without unduly impacting NASAโ€™s core human spaceflight mission.โ€

The appeal also cited the need to ensure U.S. national security and economic competitiveness with China, India| and Russia.

โ€œWe must not put ourselves in the position of watching Chinese astronauts planting their flag on the moon while we sit โ€” earthbound by our own shortsightedness,โ€ the letter states.

During a Feb. 10 hearing of the House Appropriations commerce, justice, science subcommittee, Wolf did not mention the letter, but questioned NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin as to whether NASA is duplicating the functions of other federal agencies.

โ€œAre there things that NASAโ€™s doing that are not initially part of the organic act that other agencies are doing, meritorious โ€” Iโ€™m not knocking โ€” but that we could then take the resources and put them into what the authorization said?โ€ Wolf asked Martin during the hearing.