SEATTLE โ New batches of plutonium-238 may become available to NASA starting in 2017, perhaps preventing feared shortages of this vital spacecraft power source.
The United States has not produced plutonium-238 โ a nonweapons-grade isotope that has been powering NASA space probes since the early 1970s โ and planetary scientists say stockpiles are worryingly low. But a production restart is now under way, say officials with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which supplies plutonium-238 to the space agency.
โWe have turned the spade in starting the project for renewed plutonium production,โ Wade Carroll, DOEโs deputy director of space and defense power systems, said in March at the Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space conference in The Woodlands, Texas. โItโll take probably five or six years before the next new plutonium is available.โ
Scientists take advantage of plutonium-238โs radioactive nature. The isotope emits heat, which can be converted to electricity using a device called a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, or RTG.
RTGs have long been the power system of choice for NASA missions to destinations in deep space, where scant sunlight makes solar panels impractical. RTGs have powered some of the space agencyโs most famous spacecraft, including the two Voyager probes that are nearing the edge of the solar system and the Cassini spacecraft currently surveying Saturn and its moons.
Plutonium is also fueling NASAโs New Horizons probe, which launched in 2006 and will make a close flyby of Pluto in 2015, as well as the car-size Curiosity rover, which is due to land on Mars in August.
While DOE does not publicly disclose the size of the nationโs plutonium-238 stores, many planetary scientists think the cupboard is almost bare after the November launch of Curiosity, which carries 3.6 kilograms of the material.
โWeโre down to one more trip out to do some exploring, and thatโs it,โ New Horizons principal investigator Alan Stern said late last year. โItโs just crazy. To be that close to the edge before weโre out of capability is irresponsible.โ
NASA officials, for their part, have said there is enough of the isotope left to fuel space missions through 2020 or thereabouts.
So Stern and others have been pushing for a restart of plutonium-238 production. It is important to get things going soon, they say, because the process takes a long time. Targets made of neptunium-237 must be fabricated and then irradiated in a nuclear reactor to make plutonium-238.
For the past several years, both NASA and DOE have asked for money to fund a restart. They estimate it will cost between $75 million and $90 million over five years, and the two agencies want to split the costs.
Congress has given NASA some money โ $10 million both last year and this year, for example. But lawmakers have denied DOEโs funding request for three years in a row, Carroll said.
Despite the bad budget news, some restart planning and technological development are already under way, according to Carroll. And NASA is doing what it can to help the project along.
โRight now, I think thereโs $10 million in this yearโs budget and $10 million in next yearโs budget, which we do plan on sending to the Department of Energy to continue the efforts that weโve begun,โ said Leonard Dudzinski, a NASA program executive who deals with radioisotope power systems.โ Iโm fully confident that we will be able to continue this, and ultimately have plutonium produced in this country again in kilogram quantities, on an annual basis.โ
The goal is to eventually produce between 1.5 to 2 kilograms of plutonium-238 per year, which should be enough to support NASAโs robotic planetary science missions, Dudzinski said.
โNow, if there were other missions that came along on the human side, then I think we would need more,โ he added. โBut to date, those missions have not materialized.โ
RELATED ARTICLES
NASA Presses on with Pu-238 Restart Despite Congressional Resistance
NASA, DoE Hope Third Time is the Charm for Pu-238 Funding
Budget Impasse Stalls U.S. Effort to Revive Plutonium-238 Production
