HOUSTON โ€” The Smithsonian Institutionโ€™s National Air and Space Museum may incorporate debris from space shuttles Columbia and Challenger in its new gallery dedicated to the soon-ending shuttle program. The Washington display will only go forward, however, if the families of the shuttlesโ€™ fallen astronauts and NASA agree with the museumโ€™s plans.

The solemn artifacts, which were recovered in the wake of the loss of shuttle Challenger 25 years ago and the loss of Columbia eight years ago, would be used to teach the public about the conditions that led to the two tragedies, according to curator Valerie Neal, who spoke exclusively with collectSPACE.com.

โ€œWe now have an exhibit environment, the new โ€˜Moving Beyond Earthโ€™ exhibit, where we will address each of the tragedies,โ€ Neal said. โ€œSo, having an artifact related to them would be appropriate. It would be part of a story and it wouldnโ€™t be just an object that people would stare at and say, โ€˜Wow, thatโ€™s part of the tragedy.โ€™ But it would it be an object that they could learn something from.โ€

Challenger and its seven-person STS-51L crew were lost 73 seconds into the orbiterโ€™s 10th flight on Jan. 28, 1986. Cold weather had compromised an O-ring seal on one of the shuttleโ€™s two solid rocket boosters, resulting in hot gas burning through the right booster, damaging the hardware that connected it to the vehicle and causing the structural failure of the shuttleโ€™s external fuel tank.

Challenger then broke apart, succumbing to aerodynamic forces, and fell in pieces into the Atlantic Ocean.

Columbia, with its seven STS-107 astronauts, broke apart during re-entry into Earthโ€™s atmosphere on Feb. 1, 2003. Its loss was predicated by its left wing sustaining damage 16 days earlier during launch. A small piece of external tank insulating foam struck the wingโ€™s leading edge, leaving a hole that went undetected during the flight.

On re-entry, hot plasma entered the wing, tearing it apart, and the resulting loss of control led to Columbiaโ€™s disintegration. According to Neal, who curates the space shuttle program for the National Air and Space Museum, whatever debris is chosen would need to tell a story.

โ€œWhatever weโ€™d be interested in showing would have to have a story to it in its own right and not just be displayed as a piece of debris from the vehicle as simply a sign of the tragedy,โ€ Neal said. โ€œIt would need to have more content to it, otherwise it would be too much like just displaying a car that is involved in a terrible smash-up so that people can see how awful it was. We wouldnโ€™t want to just do that. Thereโ€™s something kind of prurient about that.โ€

โ€œSo if there are articles that had a particular story to them, then I think those would be candidates for display,โ€ she added.

Those debris stories would be displayed inside the โ€œMoving Beyond Earthโ€ gallery, an exhibition devoted to the shuttle and space station programs, now under development. The first phase of the gallery opened to the public in 2009.

The debris would be placed aside other exhibits designed to explain the tragedies and lessons learned from them.

โ€œFrom the manufacturers we are going to try to get a piece of an O-ring, if not an entire O-ring, and also a piece that has burn-through, so you can see, graphically, what burn-through or near-burn-through looks like,โ€ Neal said.

โ€œAnd for the Columbia discussion, weโ€™re obtaining a mockup of the [external tank] PAL ramp area and a sample of the foam, so you can see what the foam looked like and how big a piece of foam it was. And weโ€™ll probably also have, if not a whole leading edge panel, some portion of a wing leading edge panel.โ€

โ€œThat all fits together and gives [the debris] context. It gives a story so you can learn something, so it is not just a macabre object. People used to go to museums to look at shrunken heads or something like that. We donโ€™t want to just put a curiosity piece out there as that is kind of morbid, which people wouldnโ€™t learn anything from.โ€

โ€œWe want to create enough of a story that [visitors] can achieve a better understanding [of the tragedies]. If the object helped to accomplish that, then I think it would be appropriate to display the object,โ€ Neal said.

 

Robert Z. Pearlman is editor of collectSPACE.com. An unabridged version of this story can be read at his website.